So the New Yorker published a piece of take-down trash against Henry.
And the Thoreauvian scholars are up in arms.
He hasn't had so much published about him in centuries.
(I, for one, am excited about the conversations)
If it is a matter of reverse-psychology, then it is brilliant.
If not, I know far too many people willing to go to bat for Henry.
And the Thoreauvian scholars are up in arms.
He hasn't had so much published about him in centuries.
(I, for one, am excited about the conversations)
If it is a matter of reverse-psychology, then it is brilliant.
If not, I know far too many people willing to go to bat for Henry.
